Tanzania Access to Clean Water

Percentage of population using safely managed drinking water services.

Latest available data

This page uses the latest available World Bank observation (2024). Country-level datasets often lag the current calendar year because they depend on official reporting and validation.

World Bank 2024
Current Value (2024)
31.33 % of population
Global Ranking
#123 of 148
Data Coverage
2000–2024

Historical Trend

-1.72 5.49 12.7 19.91 27.12 34.33 2000200420082012201620202024
Historical Trend

Overview

Tanzania's Access to Clean Water was 31.33 % of population in 2024, ranking #123 out of 148 countries.

Between 2000 and 2024, Tanzania's Access to Clean Water changed from 1.28 to 31.33 (2339.8%).

Over the past decade, Access to Clean Water in Tanzania changed by 59.8%, from 19.6 % of population in 2014 to 31.33 % of population in 2024.

Where is Tanzania?

Tanzania

Continent
Africa
Country
Tanzania
Coordinates
-6.00°, 35.00°

Historical Data

Year Value
2000 1.28 % of population
2001 1.32 % of population
2002 1.36 % of population
2003 1.41 % of population
2004 2.14 % of population
2005 2.93 % of population
2006 4.03 % of population
2007 5.61 % of population
2008 7.3 % of population
2009 9.09 % of population
2010 10.99 % of population
2011 12.99 % of population
2012 15.11 % of population
2013 17.33 % of population
2014 19.6 % of population
2015 21.04 % of population
2016 22.51 % of population
2017 24.03 % of population
2018 25.58 % of population
2019 27.16 % of population
2020 28.57 % of population
2021 29.26 % of population
2022 29.95 % of population
2023 30.64 % of population
2024 31.33 % of population

Global Comparison

Among all countries, Gibraltar has the highest Access to Clean Water at 100 % of population, while Central African Republic has the lowest at 6.22 % of population.

Tanzania is ranked just above Lesotho (31.32 % of population) and just below Laos (35.19 % of population).

Definition

Water access measures the percentage of a population using improved drinking water sources that are categorized by their level of service. According to the WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme, the highest standard is safely managed drinking water, which must be located on-premises, available when needed, and free from fecal and priority chemical contamination. An improved source is one designed to protect against outside contamination through its construction, including piped water, boreholes, protected wells, and rainwater collection. Lower rungs of the service ladder include basic services, where a round trip to collect water takes 30 minutes or less, and limited services, which exceed that time. Those without improved sources rely on unimproved wells or springs, or surface water from rivers and lakes. This indicator is a fundamental driver of public health, as it tracks the primary defense against waterborne diseases. It also serves as a proxy for gender equality and economic development, given that the burden of manual water collection often falls on women and girls, limiting their educational and vocational opportunities.

Formula

Safely Managed Water Access (%) = (Population using an improved source on premises, available when needed, and free from contamination ÷ Total population) × 100

Methodology

Data is primarily harmonized by the WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme using three main sources: household surveys, national censuses, and administrative data from regulators or utilities. Key surveys include Demographic and Health Surveys and Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys. To estimate safely managed services, the JMP evaluates three criteria: accessibility, availability, and quality. If data for all three are not available, the JMP often uses the minimum value of the available criteria as a conservative estimate. Data is analyzed using linear regression to produce national trends and fill gaps between survey years. A significant limitation is the lack of direct water quality testing in many household surveys, forcing researchers to use improved source type as a proxy for safety. Additionally, administrative records often undercount residents in informal settlements or those using private, unregulated water sources.

Methodology variants

  • Safely Managed Services. The most rigorous metric, requiring water to be on-premises, available when needed, and verified to be free of contamination.
  • Basic Water Services. Refers to the use of improved sources where the total collection time, including queuing, is 30 minutes or less.
  • At Least Basic. A cumulative measure representing the sum of the population using both basic and safely managed drinking water services.

How sources differ

While the JMP is the global standard, national governments may report higher access rates if they use broader definitions of improved sources or do not account for water quality and intermittency.

What is a good value?

A safely managed access rate above 99% is typical of high-income nations, while rates below 50% indicate a severe infrastructure crisis. Achieving the global target of 100% is considered essential for eliminating waterborne diseases and reducing infant mortality.

World ranking

Access to Clean Water ranking for 2024 based on World Bank data, covering 148 countries.

Access to Clean Water — World ranking (2024)
Rank Country Value
1 Gibraltar 100 % of population
2 Hong Kong 100 % of population
3 Hungary 100 % of population
4 Iceland 100 % of population
5 Kuwait 100 % of population
6 Liechtenstein 100 % of population
7 Monaco 100 % of population
8 Macau 100 % of population
9 New Zealand 100 % of population
10 Singapore 100 % of population
123 Tanzania 31.33 % of population
144 DR Congo 11.87 % of population
145 Sierra Leone 10.9 % of population
146 Tuvalu 8.72 % of population
147 Chad 6.34 % of population
148 Central African Republic 6.22 % of population
View full rankings

Global Trends

Global access to safe drinking water has expanded significantly over recent decades, yet billions of people remain underserved. Recent estimates show that approximately 74% of the global population has access to safely managed drinking water, leaving roughly 2.2 billion people without this essential service. While the number of people relying on surface water or unimproved sources has declined by hundreds of millions since the turn of the millennium, the transition to safely managed status is progressing too slowly to meet international sustainability targets by 2030. Climate change is increasingly complicating these efforts, as rising temperatures and shifting precipitation patterns cause more frequent droughts and floods that damage infrastructure and contaminate existing supplies. Furthermore, rapid urbanization is outpacing the expansion of municipal water networks in many developing regions, leading to stagnant or declining service levels in some cities. Current data indicates that the global rate of progress must quadruple to achieve universal access, particularly in fragile contexts where coverage is significantly lower than the global average.

Regional Patterns

Regional disparities in water access are profound, with Sub-Saharan Africa and parts of Oceania facing the greatest challenges. Recent data reveals that less than 31% of the population in Sub-Saharan Africa has access to safely managed water, and it remains the only region where fewer than half of schools provide basic drinking water. In contrast, Europe and North America have achieved nearly universal access, though small pockets of rural or marginalized communities still lack reliable service. There is also a persistent rural-urban divide worldwide; roughly 80% of the population lacking even basic services lives in rural areas. In these settings, the physical burden of water collection is extreme, with women and girls often carrying jerrycans weighing up to 19 kg (42 lb) over long distances. While Southern and Eastern Asia have seen the fastest improvements in basic infrastructure, many of these countries still struggle with ensuring that water is consistently free from contamination.

About this data
Source
World Bank SH.H2O.SMDW.ZS
Definition
Percentage of population using safely managed drinking water services.
Coverage
Data for 148 countries (2024)
Limitations
Data may lag 1-2 years for some countries. Coverage varies by indicator.

Frequently Asked Questions

Tanzania's Access to Clean Water was 31.33 % of population in 2024, ranking #123 out of 148 countries.

Between 2000 and 2024, Tanzania's Access to Clean Water changed from 1.28 to 31.33 (2339.8%).

Safely managed water represents the highest level of access, requiring that the water comes from an improved source located on-premises. It must also be available whenever needed and be laboratory-tested to ensure it is free from fecal and priority chemical contamination. This standard ensures water is truly safe for consumption.

In regions without home water connections, women and girls are disproportionately responsible for water collection, often spending hours daily fetching heavy containers. This time poverty prevents them from attending school or pursuing paid employment. Improving access closer to home is a key driver for empowering women and reducing physical strain.

Rural areas suffer from lower population density, making the installation of expensive piped networks and treatment plants less economically viable for governments and utilities. Geographical isolation and a lack of maintenance personnel often lead to broken infrastructure. Consequently, rural residents frequently rely on decentralized, less-monitored sources like community wells.

Improved sources, such as piped water, boreholes, and protected wells, are designed to protect water from external contamination. Unimproved sources include unprotected springs or open wells that are exposed to surface runoff and animal waste. Using an improved source is the first step toward achieving safe, reliable water access.

While billions have gained access since the 1990s, the current rate of progress is insufficient to meet universal targets by 2030. Many regions require a fourfold increase in the pace of infrastructure development to bridge the gap. Challenges like population growth and environmental degradation continue to slow progress in the most vulnerable areas.

Access to Clean Water figures for Tanzania are sourced from the World Bank Open Data API, which aggregates reporting from national statistical agencies and verified international organizations. The dataset is refreshed annually as new submissions arrive, typically with a 1–2 year reporting lag.