Uganda Gini Index
Measure of income inequality. 0 = perfect equality, 100 = perfect inequality.
This page uses the latest available World Bank observation (2019). Country-level datasets often lag the current calendar year because they depend on official reporting and validation.
Historical Trend
Overview
Uganda's Gini Index was 42.7 index (0-100) in 2019, ranking #12 out of 77 countries.
Between 1989 and 2019, Uganda's Gini Index changed from 44.4 to 42.7 (-3.8%).
Over the past decade, Gini Index in Uganda changed by -3.4%, from 44.2 index (0-100) in 2009 to 42.7 index (0-100) in 2019.
Where is Uganda?
Uganda
- Continent
- Africa
- Country
- Uganda
- Coordinates
- 1.00°, 32.00°
Historical Data
| Year | Value |
|---|---|
| 1989 | 44.4 index (0-100) |
| 1992 | 41.4 index (0-100) |
| 1996 | 39 index (0-100) |
| 1999 | 43 index (0-100) |
| 2002 | 45.2 index (0-100) |
| 2005 | 42.9 index (0-100) |
| 2009 | 44.2 index (0-100) |
| 2012 | 41 index (0-100) |
| 2016 | 42.8 index (0-100) |
| 2019 | 42.7 index (0-100) |
Global Comparison
Among all countries, Brazil has the highest Gini Index at 53.5 index (0-100), while Slovakia has the lowest at 23.2 index (0-100).
Uganda is ranked just above Dominican Republic (41.9 index (0-100)) and just below Argentina (43.3 index (0-100)).
Definition
The Gini coefficient is the most widely used measure of economic inequality, quantifying the distribution of income or wealth among a population. It is derived from the Lorenz curve, which plots the cumulative percentages of total income received against the cumulative number of recipients, starting with the poorest individual or household. A Gini coefficient of 0 represents perfect equality, where every individual shares the exact same amount of resources. Conversely, a coefficient of 1 (or 100 on a scaled index) indicates perfect inequality, where a single individual possesses all the income while everyone else has zero. This indicator is essential for economists and policymakers to assess social cohesion and the effectiveness of redistributive policies. While primarily applied to income, it is also used to analyze wealth distribution, health outcomes, and educational attainment. By providing a single summary statistic, it allows for straightforward comparisons of inequality levels across different nations and over time, though it does not reflect the absolute standard of living or the total wealth of a country.
Formula
Gini Index = Area A ÷ (Area A + Area B), where A is the area between the line of perfect equality and the Lorenz curve, and B is the area under the Lorenz curve.
Methodology
Data for the Gini coefficient are primarily collected through national household surveys, which record income or consumption expenditures. Major international organizations, such as the World Bank and the OECD, standardize these datasets to facilitate cross-country comparisons. However, methodology varies significantly between regions; some countries report gross income, while others report disposable income after taxes and transfers. Consumption-based surveys are more common in developing nations where informal economies are prevalent, whereas income-based surveys are standard in advanced economies. Limitations include the under-reporting of income by high-earning households and the exclusion of non-monetary benefits like public services or subsistence farming. Furthermore, the Gini coefficient is sensitive to changes in the middle of the distribution rather than the extreme ends, which may lead to an incomplete picture of extreme poverty or concentrated elite wealth.
Methodology variants
- Income Gini vs. Wealth Gini. Income Gini measures annual earnings, while Wealth Gini measures total accumulated assets, which typically shows much higher levels of inequality.
- Market Gini vs. Net Gini. Market Gini calculates inequality before government taxes and social transfers, whereas Net Gini reflects the distribution after redistributive policies are applied.
- Consumption Gini. Commonly used in developing nations, this measures inequality based on household spending patterns rather than reported income.
How sources differ
The World Bank focuses on global poverty data and often uses consumption surveys for lower-income nations, whereas the OECD and the Luxembourg Income Study (LIS) provide highly harmonized income data for advanced economies, leading to minor variations in reported scores.
What is a good value?
A Gini coefficient below 0.3 represents low inequality, while 0.3 to 0.4 is considered a medium level. Values exceeding 0.4 indicate high inequality, and scores above 0.5 suggest extreme disparity that often correlates with social instability.
World ranking
Gini Index ranking for 2019 based on World Bank data, covering 77 countries.
| Rank | Country | Value |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brazil | 53.5 index (0-100) |
| 2 | Colombia | 52.5 index (0-100) |
| 3 | Mozambique | 50.7 index (0-100) |
| 4 | Zimbabwe | 50.3 index (0-100) |
| 5 | Panama | 49.8 index (0-100) |
| 6 | Costa Rica | 48.2 index (0-100) |
| 7 | Honduras | 48.2 index (0-100) |
| 8 | Ecuador | 45.7 index (0-100) |
| 9 | Paraguay | 45.7 index (0-100) |
| 10 | Turkey | 43.8 index (0-100) |
| 12 | Uganda | 42.7 index (0-100) |
| 73 | Moldova | 26 index (0-100) |
| 74 | Belarus | 25.3 index (0-100) |
| 75 | Czechia | 25.3 index (0-100) |
| 76 | Slovenia | 24.4 index (0-100) |
| 77 | Slovakia | 23.2 index (0-100) |
Global Trends
Recent global trends indicate a complex shift in inequality dynamics. On a global scale, inequality between nations has generally declined over the last few decades, driven largely by the rapid economic growth of emerging economies like China and India. This reduction in the global Gini score suggests a convergence in average living standards between the Global North and South. However, within-country inequality presents a different narrative. In many advanced economies, the Gini coefficient has risen as the share of income captured by the top 1% has grown, often attributed to technological change, globalization, and the decline of labor unions. Conversely, several regions in Latin America, historically the most unequal in the world, have seen modest declines in their Gini scores due to expanded social safety nets and improved education. Despite these improvements, recent data indicates that the global progress in reducing inequality has slowed or stalled in several regions, with wealth inequality remaining significantly higher and more persistent than income inequality worldwide.
Regional Patterns
Regional patterns show significant disparities in how resources are distributed. Europe, particularly the Nordic and Central European countries, consistently maintains the lowest Gini coefficients, often ranging between 0.24 and 0.30. These levels reflect robust social welfare systems and progressive taxation. In contrast, Southern Africa remains the most unequal region globally, with Gini coefficients often exceeding 0.60. Latin America also displays high levels of inequality, typically between 0.40 and 0.50, despite recent efforts at redistribution. North America, particularly the United States, maintains a higher Gini coefficient than most other high-income peers, currently estimated around 0.41. In East Asia, patterns vary; Japan maintains relatively low inequality, while rapid growth in other areas has led to fluctuating coefficients. These regional differences are often rooted in historical land ownership patterns, institutional frameworks, and the degree of government intervention in the labor market.
About this data
- Source
- World Bank
SI.POV.GINI - Definition
- Measure of income inequality. 0 = perfect equality, 100 = perfect inequality.
- Coverage
- Data for 77 countries (2019)
- Limitations
- Data may lag 1-2 years for some countries. Coverage varies by indicator.
Frequently Asked Questions
Uganda's Gini Index was 42.7 index (0-100) in 2019, ranking #12 out of 77 countries.
Between 1989 and 2019, Uganda's Gini Index changed from 44.4 to 42.7 (-3.8%).
There is no single "ideal" number, but a Gini coefficient between 0.25 and 0.35 is generally considered to represent a relatively equitable distribution of income. Most developed nations with strong social safety nets fall within this range. Coefficients above 0.40 are often viewed as a warning sign of high inequality.
The Gini coefficient and Gini index measure the same thing using different scales. The coefficient is expressed as a decimal between 0 and 1, while the index is the coefficient multiplied by 100, resulting in a scale from 0 to 100. Both are used interchangeably in economic reports.
Yes, the Gini coefficient can measure wealth inequality, which is typically much higher than income inequality. While income Gini scores usually range from 0.20 to 0.60, wealth Gini scores often exceed 0.70 or 0.80. This is because wealth accumulates over time and is more concentrated than annual income.
High GDP per capita does not guarantee equal distribution. A country can be very wealthy in total while a small elite controls most of the resources, resulting in a high Gini coefficient. This is common in resource-rich nations or countries with limited redistributive policies, where growth does not reach the broader population.
Not necessarily. A country can have a low Gini coefficient because everyone is equally poor, as seen in some low-income agrarian societies. The Gini coefficient measures distribution, not absolute wealth or standard of living. It must be analyzed alongside other indicators like GDP per capita and the Human Development Index.
Gini Index figures for Uganda are sourced from the World Bank Open Data API, which aggregates reporting from national statistical agencies and verified international organizations. The dataset is refreshed annually as new submissions arrive, typically with a 1–2 year reporting lag.